Finding out that an that someone lied about their age can feel unfair, especially when there are allegations of statutory rape. In California, the law doesn't always take this misunderstanding into account, and you could still be charged with a sex crime, even if the other person misrepresented their age.
Accusations of statutory rape (unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor) can have significant consequences. A conviction could lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment and fines, and a tarnished reputation, underscoring the gravity of the situation.
Statutory rape is defined under Penal Code 261.5 PC as unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18 who is not the spouse of the perpetrator. Notably, this law still applies regardless of whether the minor consented to the sexual activity.
Under California law, the strict liability standard is a key factor. This means that even if the sexual activity is consensual, minors are legally incapable of consenting to sexual acts. Understanding this standard is crucial, as it could lead to charges and convictions for adults engaging in sexual conduct with a minor, regardless of the circumstances.
The severity of the charge will depend on the age difference between the defendant and the alleged victim. For example, if the age difference is 3 years or less, it's typically charged as a misdemeanor. If it's more than 3 years, it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. If the defendant is 21 or older and the minor is under 16, it's always charged as a felony.
A conviction for misdemeanor statutory rape could result in up to one year in county jail and fines up to $1,000. Felony charges could lead to a much more severe punishment, with potential sentences of 16 months to four years in state prison and fines up to $10,000.
Under the right circumstances, you might be able to avoid having to register as a sex offender. Understanding these potential sentences is crucial for preparing for the legal battle ahead and the potential impact on your life.
Mistake of Age Defense
What if the minor lied about their age? What if you had no reason to doubt them? Can this fact be used in your defense? The answer is it depends. California law does provide some flexibility if the accused was legitimately deceived or misled about the minor's age at the time the act occurred.
As noted, California typically considers statutory rape as a strict liability offense, meaning the prosecution only needs to prove the act occurred and that the alleged victim was under 18, without any exceptions.
Normally, a defendant's knowledge or belief about the alleged victim's age is not considered a defense, even when the minor lied, used a fake ID, or appeared to be over 18. This strict approach is designed to protect minors from exploitation and to place the burden of verifying age on adults.
However, California case law does offer an exception to this rule. In 1964, the California Supreme Court ruled in the case of People v. Hernandez that under certain circumstances, a defendant's reasonable belief that the alleged victim was over 18 could be a valid defense to statutory rape charges.
This court ruling created the “reasonable mistake of age” defense in some statutory rape cases, but this defense is not automatically applicable, and its use is limited.
California does recognize a reasonable mistake of age defense in statutory rape cases. This defense can be used to avoid a conviction, but it requires you to prove that the minor lied about their age and that your belief about their age was reasonable. Understanding this defense and its potential application in your case can help you feel informed and prepared.
This defense is often relevant in cases where the minor presented themselves as an adult through their words, actions, or appearance. For example, if the minor used a fake ID, stated they were over 18, and behaved in an adult manner, the court might find the mistake of age reasonable.
What is a Reasonable Mistake?
Sometimes, minors will intentionally misrepresent their age, and in some circumstances, it might not be reasonable to expect someone to uncover the truth. Suppose a lawyer can show valid evidence supporting these factors. In that case, the defense against statutory rape charges may be successful.
Notably, however, the reasonable mistake of age defense does not necessarily mean statutory rape charges will not be filed. Rather, it is a legal argument that can be used during a trial to avoid a conviction.
The key to this defense strategy is the concept of reasonableness. For example, just claiming you thought the minor was 18 or older is not enough. Instead, you must show that your belief was reasonable based on the circumstances. Courts will review several factors to determine if the mistake was reasonable, including the following:
- Appearance. A court will evaluate whether the minor looked old enough to support the claim that they were of legal age. If their physical appearance clearly suggests they are underage, it will not be possible to argue that the mistake was reasonable.
- Behavior. Suppose the minor repeatedly claims to be 18 or older, shows documentation, and interacts with you socially in ways that support their claim of being an adult. In that case, these factors could strengthen the defense.
- Steps taken. Courts might scrutinize whether you took any steps to confirm their age if there was any reasonable doubt. Suppose they showed you an ID that looked valid. In that case, it could justify the reasonableness of the mistake.
Limitations of Mistake of Age
It's important to note that the reasonable mistake of age defense has limitations. For example, the mistake must not only be honest but also objectively reasonable, meaning that an average person in the same situation, exercising reasonable caution, would have made the same mistake.
Factors that can undermine the defense in statutory rape cases include the following:
- The minor's physical appearance obviously shows they were younger than 18.
- Information about the minor's age that the defendant ignored or failed to investigate.
- Engaging in sexual conduct without verifying the minor's age in circumstances where doubt was reasonable.
- The defense is typically available if the alleged victim is under 14 years old.
- The defendant must prove that their mistake was both honest and reasonable.
Other Defenses for Statutory Rape
There are other possible defenses to statutory rape that an experienced California sex crime lawyer might use, as discussed below. It's important to remember that sometimes, allegations of statutory rape are simply not true.
We can investigate the circumstances and might be able to challenge the credibility of the accusations, providing a strong defense against false claims.
Perhaps we can argue that there is insufficient evidence. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that sexual intercourse occurred. If there's insufficient evidence, we may be able to get the charges reduced or dismissed.
Perhaps we can argue that there were constitutional violations. If police violated your rights during the investigation or arrest, the evidence may be suppressed, leading to reduced or dismissed charges.
Also, the age difference between the defendant and the alleged victim can affect how the case is charged and sentenced. For more information, contact the Hedding Law Firm, located in Los Angeles, CA.
Related Content:
